You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Competitive interaction with keystone taxa induced negative priming under biochar amendments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-019-0693-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lijun Chen, Yuji Jiang, Chao Liang, Yu Luo, Qinsong Xu, Cheng Han, Qiguo Zhao, Bo Sun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,827,104
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,044
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,376
of 350,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#39
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.