↓ Skip to main content

External validation of pooled cohort equations using systolic blood pressure intervention trial data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
External validation of pooled cohort equations using systolic blood pressure intervention trial data
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4293-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Kuragaichi, Yuki Kataoka, Chisato Miyakoshi, Tadashi Miyamoto, Yukihito Sato

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 13 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,283,805
of 15,037,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,756
of 3,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,954
of 263,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,037,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,353 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them