You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12014-010-9055-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bryan T. Hennessy, Yiling Lu, Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo, Mark S. Carey, Simen Myhre, Zhenlin Ju, Michael A. Davies, Wenbin Liu, Kevin Coombes, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Isabelle Bedrosian, Mollianne McGahren, Roshan Agarwal, Fan Zhang, Jens Overgaard, Jan Alsner, Richard M. Neve, Wen-Lin Kuo, Joe W. Gray, Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale, Gordon B. Mills |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 26% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,956,108
of 23,760,369 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#53
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,554
of 101,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,760,369 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them