↓ Skip to main content

Phase II study of olaparib in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma following failure of standard chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phase II study of olaparib in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma following failure of standard chemotherapy
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edwin Choy, James E Butrynski, David C Harmon, Jeffrey A Morgan, Suzanne George, Andrew J Wagner, David D’Adamo, Gregory M Cote, Yael Flamand, Cyril H Benes, Daniel A Haber, Jose M Baselga, George D Demetri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,362,987
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,115
of 8,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,231
of 262,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#112
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.