↓ Skip to main content

Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Garfield, Sarah Clifford, Lina Eliasson, Nick Barber, Alan Willson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 21%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 14%
Psychology 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 40 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,738,509
of 20,610,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,397
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,240
of 286,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,610,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them