↓ Skip to main content

Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Garfield, Sarah Clifford, Lina Eliasson, Nick Barber, Alan Willson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 298 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 19%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 25 8%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 50 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 14%
Psychology 20 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 63 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,574,021
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,532
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,637
of 242,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.