↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 5,229)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Brohan, Claire Henderson, Kay Wheat, Estelle Malcolm, Sarah Clement, Elizabeth A Barley, Mike Slade, Graham Thornicroft

Abstract

Stigma and discrimination present an important barrier to finding and keeping work for individuals with a mental health problem. This paper reviews evidence on: 1) employment-related disclosure beliefs and behaviours of people with a mental health problem; 2) factors associated with the disclosure of a mental health problem in the employment setting; 3) whether employers are less likely to hire applicants who disclose a mental health problem; and 4) factors influencing employers' hiring beliefs and behaviours towards job applicants with a mental health problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 406 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 16%
Researcher 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 81 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 16%
Social Sciences 56 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 7%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 88 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 258. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#135,759
of 24,723,421 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#35
of 5,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#489
of 159,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,723,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.