↓ Skip to main content

A multi-centre open-label randomised non-inferiority trial comparing watchful waiting to antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media without perforation in low-risk urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multi-centre open-label randomised non-inferiority trial comparing watchful waiting to antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media without perforation in low-risk urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (the WATCH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1247-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penelope Abbott, Hasantha Gunasekera, Amanda Jane Leach, Deborah Askew, Robyn Walsh, Kelvin Kong, Federico Girosi, Chelsea Bond, Peter Morris, Sanja Lujic, Wendy Hu, Tim Usherwood, Sissy Tyson, Geoffrey Spurling, Markeeta Douglas, Kira Schubert, Shavaun Chapman, Nadeem Siddiqui, Reeion Murray, Keitha Rabbitt, Bobby Porykali, Cheryl Woodall, Tina Newman, Jennifer Reath

Abstract

Treatment guidelines recommend watchful waiting for children older than 2 years with acute otitis media (AOM) without perforation, unless they are at high risk of complications. The high prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities leads these children to be classified as high risk. Urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are at lower risk of complications, but evidence to support the subsequent recommendation for watchful waiting in this population is lacking. This non-inferiority multi-centre randomised controlled trial will determine whether watchful waiting is non-inferior to immediate antibiotics for urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children with AOM without perforation. Children aged 2 - 16 years with AOM who are considered at low risk for complications will be recruited from six participating urban primary health care services across Australia. We will obtain informed consent from each participant or their guardian. The primary outcome is clinical resolution on day 7 (no pain, no fever of at least 38 °C, no bulging eardrum and no complications of AOM such as perforation or mastoiditis) as assessed by general practitioners or nurse practitioners. Participants and outcome assessors will not be blinded to treatment. With a sample size of 198 children in each arm, we have 80 % power to detect a non-inferiority margin of up to 10 % at a significance level of 5 %, assuming clinical improvement of at least 80 % in both groups. Allowing for a 20 % dropout rate, we aim to recruit 495 children. We will analyse both by intention-to-treat and per protocol. We will assess the cost- effectiveness of watchful waiting compared to immediate antibiotic prescription. We will also report on the implementation of the trial from the perspectives of parents/carers, health professionals and researchers. The trial will provide evidence for the safety and effectiveness of watchful waiting for the management of AOM in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children living in urban settings who are considered to be at low risk of complications. The trial is registered with Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12613001068752 ). Date of registration: 24 September 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 17%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 58 37%