↓ Skip to main content

An appraisal of rehabilitation regimes used for improving functional outcome after total hip replacement surgery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An appraisal of rehabilitation regimes used for improving functional outcome after total hip replacement surgery
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1758-2555-4-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tosan Okoro, Andrew B Lemmey, Peter Maddison, John G Andrew

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review the literature with regards to studies of rehabilitation programmes that have tried to improve function after total hip replacement (THR) surgery. 15 randomised controlled trials were identified of which 11 were centre-based, 2 were home based and 2 were trials comparing home and centre based interventions. The use of a progressive resistance training (PRT) programme led to significant improvement in muscle strength and function if the intervention was carried out early (< 1 month following surgery) in a centre (6/11 centre-based studies used PRT), or late (> 1 month following surgery) in a home based setting (2/2 home based studies used PRT). In direct comparison, there was no difference in functional measures between home and centre based programmes (2 studies), with PRT not included in the regimes prescribed. A limitation of the majority of these intervention studies was the short period of follow up. Centre based program delivery is expensive as high costs are associated with supervision, facility provision, and transport of patients. Early interventions are important to counteract the deficit in muscle strength in the affected limb, as well as persistent atrophy that exists around the affected hip at 2 years post-operatively. Studies of early home-based regimes featuring PRT with long term follow up are needed to address the problems currently associated with rehabilitation following THR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Norway 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 25%
Sports and Recreations 15 10%
Engineering 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#263
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,418
of 253,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.