↓ Skip to main content

This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
Published in
Trials, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Schiavone, Riya Bathia, Krishna Letchemanan, Lindsey Masters, Claire Amos, Anna Bara, Louise Brown, Clare Gilson, Cheryl Pugh, Nafisah Atako, Fleur Hudson, Mahesh Parmar, Ruth Langley, Richard S. Kaplan, Chris Parker, Gert Attard, Noel W. Clarke, Silke Gillessen, Nicholas D. James, Tim Maughan, Matthew R. Sydes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 29%
Other 8 26%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 12 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#941,764
of 18,873,384 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#220
of 4,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,187
of 279,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,873,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them