↓ Skip to main content

A new definition of burnout syndrome based on Farber's proposal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 416)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new definition of burnout syndrome based on Farber's proposal
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-4-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Montero-Marín, Javier García-Campayo, Domingo Mosquera Mera, Yolanda López del Hoyo

Abstract

Although diverse definitions have been construed for burnout syndrome, most authors consider it to be a single phenomenon, the result of chronic work-related stress. However, in order to enable specific intervention strategies to be adopted, it is first necessary to establish different profiles for the syndrome. In this respect, have been proposed three burnout types ("frenetic", "underchallenged" and "worn-out"), each of which requires different means of dealing with frustration in the workplace. This study is an attempt to define and systematize the properties that characterize this typology proposal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 251 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 79 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 21%
Psychology 43 17%
Social Sciences 26 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 84 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,158,902
of 25,177,382 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#23
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,453
of 178,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,177,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them