You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “Hypertension Approaches in the Elderly: a Lifestyle study” multicenter, randomized trial (HAEL Study): rationale and methodological protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6970-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Umpierre, Lucas Porto Santos, Cíntia Ehlers Botton, Eurico Nestor Wilhelm, Lucas Helal, Gustavo Zaccaria Schaun, Gustavo Dias Ferreira, Angélica Trevisan De Nardi, Lucinéia Orsolin Pfeifer, Anderson Donelli da Silveira, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Graciele Ferreira Mendes, Hirofumi Tanaka, Leonardo Alves, Leony Galliano, Linda S. Pescatello, Maria Laura Brizio, Patrícia Martins Bock, Paula Campelo, Ruy Silveira Moraes, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues, Beatriz D. Schaan, Cristine Lima Alberton, Stephanie Santana Pinto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 116 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 32 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 121 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,650,729
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,707
of 15,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,603
of 350,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#281
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.