↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality of hospital acquired fungemias in ICUs: data from the EUROBACT study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality of hospital acquired fungemias in ICUs: data from the EUROBACT study
Published in
Critical Care, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1229-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

José-Artur Paiva, José Manuel Pereira, Alexis Tabah, Adam Mikstacki, Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho, Despoina Koulenti, Stéphane Ruckly, Nahit Çakar, Benoit Misset, George Dimopoulos, Massimo Antonelli, Jordi Rello, Xiaochun Ma, Barbara Tamowicz, Jean-François Timsit

Abstract

To characterize and identify prognostic factors for 28-day mortality among patients with hospital-acquired fungemia (HAF) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). A sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter non-representative cohort study conducted in 162 ICUs in 24 countries. Of the 1156 patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) included in the EUROBACT study, 96 patients had a HAF. Median time to its diagnosis was 20 days (IQR 10.5-30.5) and 9 days (IQR 3-15.5) after hospital and ICU admission, respectively. Median time to positivity of blood culture was longer in fungemia than in bacteremia (48.7 h vs. 38.1 h; p = 0.0004). Candida albicans was the most frequent fungus isolated (57.1 %), followed by Candida glabrata (15.3 %) and Candida parapsilosis (10.2 %). No clear source of HAF was detected in 33.3 % of the episodes and it was catheter-related in 21.9 % of them. Compared to patients with bacteremia, HAF patients had a higher rate of septic shock (39.6 % vs. 21.6 %; p = 0.0003) and renal dysfunction (25 % vs. 12.4 %; p = 0.0023) on admission and a higher rate of renal failure (26 % vs. 16.2 %; p = 0.0273) at diagnosis. Adequate treatment started within 24 h after blood culture collection was less frequent in HAF patients (22.9 % vs. 55.3 %; p < 0.001). The 28-day all cause fatality was 40.6 %. According to multivariate analysis, only liver failure (OR 14.35; 95 % CI 1.17-175.6; p = 0.037), need for mechanical ventilation (OR 8.86; 95 % CI 1.2-65.24; p = 0.032) and ICU admission for medical reason (OR 3.87; 95 % CI 1.25-11.99; p = 0.020) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality in HAF patients. Fungi are an important cause of hospital-acquired BSI in the ICU. Patients with HAF present more frequently with septic shock and renal dysfunction on ICU admission and have a higher rate of renal failure at diagnosis. HAF are associated with a significant 28-day mortality rate (40 %), but delayed adequate antifungal therapy was not an independent risk factor for death. Liver failure, need for mechanical ventilation and ICU admission for medical reason were the only independent predictors of 28-day mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,528,832
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,349
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,094
of 314,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.