You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social norms, misperceptions, and mosquito net use: a population-based, cross-sectional study in rural Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2798-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica M. Perkins, Paul Krezanoski, Sae Takada, Bernard Kakuhikire, Vincent Batwala, Alexander C. Tsai, Nicholas A. Christakis, David R. Bangsberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
South Africa | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 47 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 53 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,639,478
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,595
of 5,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,240
of 357,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#25
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.