↓ Skip to main content

Social norms, misperceptions, and mosquito net use: a population-based, cross-sectional study in rural Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social norms, misperceptions, and mosquito net use: a population-based, cross-sectional study in rural Uganda
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-2798-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica M. Perkins, Paul Krezanoski, Sae Takada, Bernard Kakuhikire, Vincent Batwala, Alexander C. Tsai, Nicholas A. Christakis, David R. Bangsberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 47 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 53 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,639,478
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,595
of 5,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,240
of 357,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#25
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.