↓ Skip to main content

Does diet affect breast cancer risk?

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 2,052)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does diet affect breast cancer risk?
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/bcr909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle D Holmes, Walter C Willett

Abstract

The role of specific dietary factors in breast cancer causation is not completely resolved. Results from prospective studies do not support the concept that fat intake in middle life has a major relation to breast cancer risk. However, weight gain in middle life contributes substantially to breast cancer risk. Alcohol is the best established dietary risk factor, probably by increasing endogenous estrogen levels. Hypotheses relating diet during youth to risk decades later will be difficult to test. Nevertheless, available evidence is strong that breast cancer risk can be reduced by avoiding weight gain during adult years, and by limiting alcohol consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#595,016
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#48
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#548
of 58,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.