↓ Skip to main content

Ultra-precise detection of mutations by droplet-based amplification of circularized DNA

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultra-precise detection of mutations by droplet-based amplification of circularized DNA
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2480-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaile Wang, Qin Ma, Lan Jiang, Shujuan Lai, Xuemei Lu, Yali Hou, Chung-I Wu, Jue Ruan

Abstract

NGS (next generation sequencing) has been widely used in studies of biological processes, ranging from microbial evolution to cancer genomics. However, the error rate of NGS (0.1 % ~ 1 %) is still remaining a great challenge for comprehensively investigating the low frequency variations, and the current solution methods have suffered severe amplification bias or low efficiency. We creatively developed Droplet-CirSeq for relatively efficient, low-bias and ultra-sensitive identification of variations by combining millions of picoliter uniform-sized droplets with Cir-seq. Droplet-CirSeq is entitled with an incredibly low error rate of 3 ~ 5 X 10(-6). To systematically evaluate the performances of amplification uniformity and capability of mutation identification for Droplet-CirSeq, we took the mixtures of two E. coli strains as specific instances to simulate the circumstances of mutations with different frequencies. Compared with Cir-seq, the coefficient of variance of read depth for Droplet-CirSeq was 10 times less (p = 2.6 X 10(-3)), and the identified allele frequency presented more concentrated to the authentic frequency of mixtures (p = 4.8 X 10(-3)), illustrating a significant improvement of amplification bias and accuracy in allele frequency determination. Additionally, Droplet-CirSeq detected 2.5 times genuine SNPs (p < 0.001), achieved a 2.8 times lower false positive rate (p < 0.05) and a 1.5 times lower false negative rate (p < 0.001), in the case of a 3 pg DNA input. Intriguingly, the false positive sites predominantly represented in two types of base substitutions (G- > A, C- > T). Our findings indicated that 30 pg DNA input accommodated in 5 ~ 10 million droplets resulted in maximal detection of authentic mutations compared to 3 pg (p = 1.2 X 10(-8)) and 300 pg input (p = 2.2 X 10(-3)). We developed a method namely Droplet-CirSeq to significantly improve the amplification bias, which presents obvious superiority over the currently prevalent methods in exploitation of ultra-low frequency mutations. Droplet-CirSeq would be promisingly used in the identification of low frequency mutations initiated from extremely low input DNA, such as DNA of uncultured microorganisms, captured DNA of target region, circulation DNA of plasma et al, and its creative conception of rolling circle amplification in droplets would also be used in other low input DNA amplification fields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 25%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,386,543
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,962
of 10,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,572
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#108
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.