↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Cognition Support Formula® on cognitive function in older adults with subjective cognitive impairment: a protocol for a 26-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Cognition Support Formula® on cognitive function in older adults with subjective cognitive impairment: a protocol for a 26-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3431-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adele E. Cave, Dennis H. Chang, Gerald W. Münch, Genevieve Z. Steiner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Psychology 14 20%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,578,031
of 15,906,364 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,774
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,708
of 269,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,906,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them