↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive transcriptome analysis identifies novel molecular subtypes and subtype-specific RNAs of triple-negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive transcriptome analysis identifies novel molecular subtypes and subtype-specific RNAs of triple-negative breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13058-016-0690-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Rong Liu, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Xiao-En Xu, Ke-Da Yu, Xi Jin, Xin Hu, Wen-Jia Zuo, Shuang Hao, Jiong Wu, Guang-Yu Liu, Gen-Hong Di, Da-Qiang Li, Xiang-Huo He, Wei-Guo Hu, Zhi-Ming Shao

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous group of cancers, and molecular subtyping is necessary to better identify molecular-based therapies. While some classifiers have been established, no one has integrated the expression profiles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) into such subtyping criterions. Considering the emerging important role of lncRNAs in cellular processes, a novel classification integrating transcriptome profiles of both messenger RNA (mRNA) and lncRNA would help us better understand the heterogeneity of TNBC. Using human transcriptome microarrays, we analyzed the transcriptome profiles of 165 TNBC samples. We used k-means clustering and empirical cumulative distribution function to determine optimal number of TNBC subtypes. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analyses were applied to determine the main function of the subtype-specific genes and pathways. We conducted co-expression network analyses to identify interactions between mRNAs and lncRNAs. All of the 165 TNBC tumors were classified into four distinct clusters, including an immunomodulatory subtype (IM), a luminal androgen receptor subtype (LAR), a mesenchymal-like subtype (MES) and a basal-like and immune suppressed (BLIS) subtype. The IM subtype had high expressions of immune cell signaling and cytokine signaling genes. The LAR subtype was characterized by androgen receptor signaling. The MES subtype was enriched with growth factor signaling pathways. The BLIS subtype was characterized by down-regulation of immune response genes, activation of cell cycle, and DNA repair. Patients in this subtype experienced worse recurrence-free survival than others (log rank test, P = 0.045). Subtype-specific lncRNAs were identified, and their possible biological functions were predicted using co-expression network analyses. We developed a novel TNBC classification system integrating the expression profiles of both mRNAs and lncRNAs and determined subtype-specific lncRNAs that are potential biomarkers and targets. If further validated in a larger population, our novel classification system could facilitate patient counseling and individualize treatment of TNBC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 80 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 89 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#643
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,993
of 314,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.