↓ Skip to main content

Human antibody response to dengue virus: implications for dengue vaccine design

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Medicine and Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 441)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human antibody response to dengue virus: implications for dengue vaccine design
Published in
Tropical Medicine and Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s41182-016-0004-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng Ling Moi, Tomohiko Takasaki, Ichiro Kurane

Abstract

Dengue, a global health threat, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in most tropical and subtropical countries. Dengue can range from asymptomatic, relatively mild dengue fever to severe and life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever. Disease severity and outcome is largely associated with the host immune response. Several candidate vaccines in clinical trials appear promising as effective measures for dengue disease control. Vaccine development has been hampered by safety and efficacy issues, driven by a lack of understanding of the host immune response. This review focuses on recent research findings on the dengue host immune response, particularly in humans, and the relevance of these findings to challenges in vaccine development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,811,009
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Medicine and Health
#37
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,837
of 314,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Medicine and Health
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.