↓ Skip to main content

A double-blind randomized study assessing safety and efficacy following one-year adjunctive treatment with bitopertin, a glycine reuptake inhibitor, in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A double-blind randomized study assessing safety and efficacy following one-year adjunctive treatment with bitopertin, a glycine reuptake inhibitor, in Japanese patients with schizophrenia
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0778-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshio Hirayasu, Shin-Ichi Sato, Hideaki Takahashi, Sayaka Iida, Norifumi Shuto, Seitaro Yoshida, Takashi Funatogawa, Takahito Yamada, Teruhiko Higuchi

Abstract

Bitopertin, a glycine reuptake inhibitor, was investigated as a novel treatment for schizophrenia. We report all the results of a double-blind randomized study assessing safety and efficacy following 52-week adjunctive treatment with bitopertin in Japanese patients with schizophrenia. This study enrolled Japanese outpatients with schizophrenia who met criteria for either "negative symptoms", i.e., patients with persistent, predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia even after long-term treatment with antipsychotics or "sub-optimally controlled symptoms", i.e., patients with insufficiently improved symptoms of schizophrenia even after long-term treatment with antipsychotics, respectively. One hundred sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive 52-week treatments with bitopertin doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg/day at ratio of 1:5:5, where existing antipsychotics were concomitantly administered. Efficacy endpoints included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and Personal and Social Performance (PSP). The purpose of the present study is primarily to evaluate the safety, and secondarily to investigate the clinical efficacy of bitopertin. One hundred fourteen patients (71 %) completed 52-week treatment with bitopertin. Most of the adverse events were mild or moderate in their severity. The patients in the 20-mg group experienced more adverse events than the patients in the other two groups. Common dose-dependent adverse events were somnolence and insomnia associated with worsening schizophrenia. The blood hemoglobin levels gradually decreased from baseline in a dose-dependent manner, but there were no patients with the decrease below 10 g/dL that would have led to their discontinuation. All the efficacy endpoints gradually improved in all the treatment groups for both of the two symptoms, while there were no clear differences among the three dose groups. Altogether, bitopertin was found to be generally safe and well-tolerated for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. All three bitopertin treated groups showed improvements in all the efficacy endpoints for both of the two symptoms, i.e., "negative symptoms" and "sub-optimally controlled symptoms", throughout the duration of the study. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-111627 (registered on September 20, 2011).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Psychology 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,342,641
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,659
of 5,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,253
of 303,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#65
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.