You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A novel system for introducing precisely-controlled, unanticipated gait perturbations for the study of stumble recovery
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2019
Shane T. King, Maura E. Eveld, Andrés Martínez, Karl E. Zelik, Michael Goldfarb
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||21||24%|
|Student > Master||18||21%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||9||10%|
|Sports and Recreations||7||8%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||5%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 353,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.