You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What evidence exists on the effects of anthropogenic noise on acoustic communication in animals? A systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0165-3 |
| Authors |
Oded Berger-Tal, Bob B. M. Wong, Ulrika Candolin, Jesse Barber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,525,716
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#141
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,431
of 372,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.