↓ Skip to main content

Fortunella margarita Transcriptional Reprogramming Triggered by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fortunella margarita Transcriptional Reprogramming Triggered by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-11-159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abeer A Khalaf, Frederick G Gmitter, Ana Conesa, Joaquin Dopazo, Gloria A Moore

Abstract

Citrus canker disease caused by the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) has become endemic in areas where high temperature, rain, humidity, and windy conditions provide a favourable environment for the dissemination of the bacterium. Xcc is pathogenic on many commercial citrus varieties but appears to elicit an incompatible reaction on the citrus relative Fortunella margarita Swing (kumquat), in the form of a very distinct delayed necrotic response. We have developed subtractive libraries enriched in sequences expressed in kumquat leaves during both early and late stages of the disease. The isolated differentially expressed transcripts were subsequently sequenced. Our results demonstrate how the use of microarray expression profiling can help assign roles to previously uncharacterized genes and elucidate plant pathogenesis-response related mechanisms. This can be considered to be a case study in a citrus relative where high throughput technologies were utilized to understand defence mechanisms in Fortunella and citrus at the molecular level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,481
of 3,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,324
of 142,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.