You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Age-related sarcopenia and its pathophysiological bases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation and Regeneration, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41232-016-0022-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sumito Ogawa, Mitsutaka Yakabe, Masahiro Akishita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,381,652
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#37
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,654
of 345,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them