↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Examining the efficacy of anti-predator training for increasing survival in conservation translocations: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the efficacy of anti-predator training for increasing survival in conservation translocations: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0154-6
Authors

Alison L. Greggor, Catherine J. Price, Debra M. Shier

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 44%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,797,447
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#181
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,932
of 279,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.

This page is provided by Altmetric.