↓ Skip to main content

Examining the efficacy of anti-predator training for increasing survival in conservation translocations: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the efficacy of anti-predator training for increasing survival in conservation translocations: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0154-6
Authors

Alison L. Greggor, Catherine J. Price, Debra M. Shier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 38%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Psychology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,432,670
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#223
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,349
of 355,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.