↓ Skip to main content

A realist process evaluation of Enhanced Triple P for Baby and Mellow Bumps, within a Trial of Healthy Relationship Initiatives for the Very Early years (THRIVE): study protocol for a randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A realist process evaluation of Enhanced Triple P for Baby and Mellow Bumps, within a Trial of Healthy Relationship Initiatives for the Very Early years (THRIVE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3395-3
Authors

Rosaleen O’Brien, Katie Buston, Daniel Wight, Elizabeth McGee, Jane White, Marion Henderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 27%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 26 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,763,758
of 21,173,427 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,018
of 5,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,579
of 288,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them