↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the short assessment of health literacy (SAHL-D) and short-form development: Rasch analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the short assessment of health literacy (SAHL-D) and short-form development: Rasch analysis
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0762-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Woudstra, C. S. Meppelink, H. Pander Maat, J. Oosterhaven, M. P. Fransen, A. L. Dima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 14%
Psychology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,347,433
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#952
of 2,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,357
of 353,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#27
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.