You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Who should decide about children’s and adolescents’ participation in health research? The views of children and adults in rural Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0375-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Marsh, Nancy Mwangome, Irene Jao, Katharine Wright, Sassy Molyneux, Alun Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 10 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 22% |
| Vietnam | 2 | 5% |
| Malawi | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,145,969
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#88
of 1,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,028
of 353,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.