You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Erratum to: ‘Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods’
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-016-0402-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo, Mira Johri, Francisco Jose Perez-Ramos, Gracia Maroto-Navarro, Africa Caño-Aguilar, Leticia Garcia-Mochon, Longinos Aceituno, François Audibert, Nils Chaillet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 33% |
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Professor | 2 | 17% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,711
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,989
of 314,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#45
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.