↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in four different weight related patient groups: association with small bowel length and risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in four different weight related patient groups: association with small bowel length and risk factors
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1224-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Hillenbrand, Brigitte Kiebler, Cornelia Schwab, Ludger Scheja, Pengfei Xu, Doris Henne-Bruns, Anna Maria Wolf, Uwe Knippschild

Abstract

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an obesity associated common cause of liver inflammation and there are concerns that it may turn out to be the most common cause of liver failure as prevalence of obesity increases. We determined the prevalence of NASH in relation to gender and body mass index (BMI). Furthermore, we assessed the association of NASH with the length of the small bowel. 124 liver samples obtained during routine operations were examined looking for NAFLD Activity Score (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). The length of small bowel was measured intraoperatively. For evaluation, patients were divided into four groups according to their BMI (group 1: normal weight, group 2: overweight, group 3: grade I/II morbidly obese, and group 4 grade III morbidly obese patients). BMI showed a strong positive correlation with risk of NASH and a weak positive correlation with small bowel length. No normal weight patient was at risk of NASH, whereas in group 2 14% had uncertain and 32% definite NASH. In group 3 11% had uncertain and 27% definite NASH. In group 4 nearly two-thirds were classified as uncertain or definite NASH. Median length of small bowel in all patients was 450 cm (range 226-860 cm). Within group 4, patients with definite/uncertain NASH had a longer small bowel than patients without NASH. Prevalence of NASH is high in morbidly obese. Small bowel length could influence the complex etiology of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,315,221
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,563
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,259
of 262,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#64
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.