You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exome sequencing in routine diagnostics: a generic test for 254 patients with primary immunodeficiencies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-019-0649-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peer Arts, Annet Simons, Mofareh S. AlZahrani, Elanur Yilmaz, Eman AlIdrissi, Koen J. van Aerde, Njood Alenezi, Hamza A. AlGhamdi, Hadeel A. AlJubab, Abdulrahman A. Al-Hussaini, Fahad AlManjomi, Alaa B. Alsaad, Badr Alsaleem, Abdulrahman A. Andijani, Ali Asery, Walid Ballourah, Chantal P. Bleeker-Rovers, Marcel van Deuren, Michiel van der Flier, Erica H. Gerkes, Christian Gilissen, Murad K. Habazi, Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa, Stefanie S. Henriet, Esther P. Hoppenreijs, Sarah Hortillosa, Chantal H. Kerkhofs, Riikka Keski-Filppula, Stefan H. Lelieveld, Khurram Lone, Marius A. MacKenzie, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Jukka Moilanen, Marcel Nelen, Jaap ten Oever, Judith Potjewijd, Pieter van Paassen, Janneke H. M. Schuurs-Hoeijmakers, Anna Simon, Tomasz Stokowy, Maartje van de Vorst, Maaike Vreeburg, Anja Wagner, Gijs T. J. van Well, Dimitra Zafeiropoulou, Evelien Zonneveld-Huijssoon, Joris A. Veltman, Wendy A. G. van Zelst-Stams, Eissa A. Faqeih, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Mihai G. Netea, Alexander Hoischen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 43% |
| Scientists | 15 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,855,293
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#403
of 1,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,099
of 368,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.