↓ Skip to main content

Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Lau, Morgan Price, Jeanette Boyd, Colin Partridge, Heidi Bell, Rebecca Raworth

Abstract

Increased investments are being made for electronic medical records (EMRs) in Canada. There is a need to learn from earlier EMR studies on their impact on physician practice in office settings. To address this need, we conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of EMRs in the physician office, factors that influenced their success, and the lessons learned.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 386 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 12%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 94 23%
Unknown 76 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 29%
Computer Science 52 13%
Social Sciences 35 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 27 7%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 89 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,351,375
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#144
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,880
of 157,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.