You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissecting genetic architecture of grape proanthocyanidin composition through quantitative trait locus mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-12-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yung-Fen Huang, Agnès Doligez, Alexandre Fournier-Level, Loïc Le Cunff, Yves Bertrand, Aurélie Canaguier, Cécile Morel, Valérie Miralles, Frédéric Veran, Jean-Marc Souquet, Véronique Cheynier, Nancy Terrier, Patrice This |
| Abstract |
Proanthocyanidins (PAs), or condensed tannins, are flavonoid polymers, widespread throughout the plant kingdom, which provide protection against herbivores while conferring organoleptic and nutritive values to plant-derived foods, such as wine. However, the genetic basis of qualitative and quantitative PA composition variation is still poorly understood. To elucidate the genetic architecture of the complex grape PA composition, we first carried out quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis on a 191-individual pseudo-F1 progeny. Three categories of PA variables were assessed: total content, percentages of constitutive subunits and composite ratio variables. For nine functional candidate genes, among which eight co-located with QTLs, we performed association analyses using a diversity panel of 141 grapevine cultivars in order to identify causal SNPs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,064
of 3,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,681
of 155,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.