↓ Skip to main content

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
81 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ketevan Glonti, Daniel Cauchi, Erik Cobo, Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, Darko Hren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#693,177
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#488
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,801
of 368,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.