↓ Skip to main content

How people with dementia and their families decide about moving to a care home and support their needs: development of a decision aid, a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How people with dementia and their families decide about moving to a care home and support their needs: development of a decision aid, a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12877-016-0242-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Lord, Gill Livingston, Sarah Robertson, Claudia Cooper

Abstract

People with dementia and their relatives find decisions about the person with dementia living in a care home difficult. We interviewed 20 people with dementia or family carers around the time of this decision in order to design a decision-aid. Decision-makers balanced the competing priorities of remaining somewhere familiar, family's wish they remain at home, reduction of risk and effects on carer's and person with dementia's physical health. The person with dementia frequently resented their lack of autonomy as decisions about care home moves were made after insight and judgment were impaired. Family consultation usually helped carers but sometimes exacerbated tensions. Direct professional support was appreciated where it was available. There is a need for healthcare professionals to facilitate these conversations around decision-making and to include more than signposting to other organisations. There is a need for a healthcare professional facilitated decision-aid. This should detail what might change for the person with dementia and their carer, possible resources and alternatives and assist in facilitating discussion with the wider family; further research will develop and test a tool to facilitate decision making about place of care needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Psychology 18 14%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,840,982
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#739
of 3,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,069
of 303,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#11
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.