You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Health services for reproductive tract infections among female migrant workers in industrial zones in Ha Noi, Viet Nam: an in-depth assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Health, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-9-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Le Anh Thi Kim, Lien Thi Lan Pham, Lan Hoang Vu, Esther Schelling |
Abstract |
Rural-to-urban migration involves a high proportion of females because job opportunities for female migrants have increased in urban industrial areas. Those who migrate may be healthier than those staying in the village and they may benefit from better health care services at destination, but the 'healthy' effect can be reversed at destination due to migration-related health risk factors. The study aimed to explore the need for health care services for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) among female migrants working in the Sai Dong industrial zone as well as their services utilization. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,911,493
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#778
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,065
of 155,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.