↓ Skip to main content

Acid-base balance and hydration status following consumption of mineral-based alkaline bottled water

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 893)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
77 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acid-base balance and hydration status following consumption of mineral-based alkaline bottled water
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-7-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel P Heil

Abstract

The present study sought to determine whether the consumption of a mineral-rich alkalizing (AK) bottled water could improve both acid-base balance and hydration status in young healthy adults under free-living conditions. The AK water contains a naturally high mineral content along with Alka-PlexLiquid™, a dissolved supplement that increases the mineral content and gives the water an alkalizing pH of 10.0.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 22%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Sports and Recreations 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 629. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#30,159
of 23,429,601 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#18
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,010
of 442,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#18
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,429,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.