↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of obesity in children with autism: a secondary data analysis using nationally representative data from the National Survey of Children's Health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prevalence of obesity in children with autism: a secondary data analysis using nationally representative data from the National Survey of Children's Health
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-10-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Curtin, Sarah E Anderson, Aviva Must, Linda Bandini

Abstract

The prevalence of childhood obesity has increased dramatically in the last two decades and numerous efforts to understand, intervene on, and prevent this significant threat to children's health are underway for many segments of the pediatric population. Understanding the prevalence of obesity in populations of children with developmental disorders is an important undertaking, as the factors that give rise to obesity may not be the same as for typically developing children, and because prevention and treatment efforts may need to be tailored to meet their needs and the needs of their families. The goal of the current study was to estimate the prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents with autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 342 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Student > Bachelor 53 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 17%
Psychology 50 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 11%
Social Sciences 31 9%
Sports and Recreations 30 9%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 75 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,727,319
of 24,713,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#383
of 3,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,208
of 98,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,713,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.