↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 620)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study
Published in
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40697-016-0105-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gihad E. Nesrallah, Lihua Li, Rita S. Suri

Abstract

Home dialysis is being increasingly promoted among patients with end-stage renal disease, but the comparative effectiveness of home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis is unknown. To determine whether patients receiving home daily hemodialysis have reduced mortality risk compared with matched patients receiving home peritoneal dialysis. This study is an observational, propensity-matched, new-user cohort study. Linked electronic data were from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and a large dialysis provider's database. The patients were adults receiving in-center hemodialysis in the USA between 2004 and 2011 and registered in the USRDS. Baseline comorbidities, demographics, and outcomes for both groups were ascertained from the United States Renal Data System. We identified 3142 consecutive adult patients initiating home daily hemodialysis (≥5 days/week for ≥1.5 h/day) and matched 2688 of them by propensity score to 2688 contemporaneous US patients initiating home peritoneal dialysis. We used Cox regression to compare all-cause mortality between groups. After matching, the two groups were well balanced on all baseline characteristics. Mean age was 51 years, 66 % were male, 72 % were white, and 29 % had diabetes. During 10,221 patient-years of follow-up, 1493/5336 patients died. There were significantly fewer deaths among patients receiving home daily hemodialysis than those receiving peritoneal dialysis (12.7 vs 16.7 deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95 % CI 0.68-0.82; p < 0.001). Similar results were noted with several different analytic methods and for all pre-specified subgroups. We cannot exclude residual confounding in this observational study. Home daily hemodialysis was associated with lower mortality risk than home peritoneal dialysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 33%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 26%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,199,472
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#16
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,339
of 314,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.