You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalisation schemes in social care: are they growing social and health inequalities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7168-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Malbon, Gemma Carey, Ariella Meltzer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 30 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| Ireland | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 70% |
| Scientists | 19 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#417,891
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#376
of 17,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,667
of 367,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#11
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.