↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Middleton, Glenn Gardner, Mary Haines, Maggie Haertsch, Christine L Paul, Peter Castaldi

Abstract

Clinical networks have been established to improve health outcomes and processes of care by implementing a range of innovations and undertaking projects based on perceived local need. Limited research exists on the necessary conditions required to bring about successful network outcomes and what characterises network success from the perspective of those involved in network initiatives. This qualitative study identified stakeholder views on i) the conditions for effective clinical networks; and ii) desirable outcomes of successful clinical networks.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,762,320
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,894
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,887
of 116,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.