↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels in the acute phase of sepsis on lower long-term physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels in the acute phase of sepsis on lower long-term physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors
Published in
Critical Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2505-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Custodero, Quran Wu, Gabriela L. Ghita, Stephen D. Anton, Scott C. Brakenridge, Babette A. Brumback, Philip A. Efron, Anna K. Gardner, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Lyle L. Moldawer, John W. Petersen, Frederick A. Moore, Robert T. Mankowski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 27 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,914
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,907
of 366,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#90
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.