You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Is platelet-rich plasma an ideal biomaterial for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2019
Changxu Han, Yuyan Na, Yong Zhu, Lingyue Kong, Tu Eerdun, Xuejun Yang, Yizhong Ren
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||8||8%|
|Student > Bachelor||8||8%|
|Student > Postgraduate||7||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||40||41%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||7||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||2%|
|Sports and Recreations||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 352,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.