↓ Skip to main content

Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40104-019-0352-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Luise, Charlotte Lauridsen, Paolo Bosi, Paolo Trevisi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#657
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,632
of 368,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.