↓ Skip to main content

Scoping implementation science for the beginner: locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 2,296)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
131 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scoping implementation science for the beginner: locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0783-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghan B. Lane-Fall, Geoffrey M. Curran, Rinad S. Beidas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 12 5%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 58 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Psychology 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 73 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#481,882
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#39
of 2,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,141
of 366,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.