You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using genetic variation in Aedes aegypti to identify candidate anti-dengue virus genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4212-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerard Terradas, Elizabeth A. McGraw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,643,325
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,514
of 7,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,114
of 348,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#39
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.