↓ Skip to main content

Methodology and reporting characteristics of studies using interrupted time series design in healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodology and reporting characteristics of studies using interrupted time series design in healthcare
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0777-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jemma Hudson, Shona Fielding, Craig R. Ramsay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 364 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 14%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 105 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Psychology 13 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 2%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 132 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,363,888
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#152
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,757
of 363,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.