You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trust and the ethical challenges in the use of whole genome sequencing for tuberculosis surveillance: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0380-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carly Jackson, Jennifer L. Gardy, Hedieh C. Shadiloo, Diego S. Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| South Africa | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,689,799
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#281
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,851
of 354,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.