You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficacy of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light technology on Candida auris
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4137-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Maslo, Moira du Plooy, Jennifer Coetzee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#432,811
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#107
of 7,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,827
of 353,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.