You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expanding the bioluminescent reporter toolkit for plant science with NanoLUC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0454-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uriel Urquiza-García, Andrew J. Millar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,144,011
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#167
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,382
of 361,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.