You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of the caregiver burden associated with Sanfilippo syndrome type B: panel recommendations based on qualitative and quantitative data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-019-1150-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elsa Shapiro, Charles Marques Lourenço, Neslihan Onenli Mungan, Nicole Muschol, Cara O’Neill, Suresh Vijayaraghavan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 28 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
Psychology | 6 | 10% |
Unspecified | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,556,976
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#616
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,544
of 346,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.